| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • Stop wasting time looking for files and revisions. Connect your Gmail, DriveDropbox, and Slack accounts and in less than 2 minutes, Dokkio will automatically organize all your file attachments. Learn more and claim your free account.

View
 

Notes from the After Action Review

Page history last edited by Lucie Lamoureux 12 years ago

What worked well?

 

  • Good team and good team spirit
  • The communities took it positively
  • Able to understand how successful the activities had been, areas rated high
  • Able to identify areas that were NOT successful
  • Good to have the guidelines - exercise planned on them
  • Good project director
  • Government support

 

What didn't work as well?

  • Time constraints
  • No guidance on guidelines, had to interpret
  • Weak M&E systems in projects
  • Lack of funds

 

How could we do things differently?

  • Time constraints:
    • Start at cluster level
    • Give guidelines to projects from Day 1
    • Have a one-year process, instaed of reports
  • No guidance on guidelines, had to interpret:
    • Someone form IFAD should be there from Day 1 to explain the guidelines
  • Weak M&E systems in projects:
    • Could compensate if guidelines given in advance
    • Would be helpful to have logframes
  • Lack of funds:
    • Need to budget in advance

 

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.